Litigation Alternatives, Inc. is a full-service Alternative Dispute Resolution in Connecticut(CT)

In general, the selection of a mediator or arbitrator is driven by either the facts of the case submitted {including interpersonal dynamics of the parties involved} and the credibility of the potential neutral.

Accordingly, when a case is submitted to Litigation Alternatives, Inc. and the neutral has been mutually agreed to by the parties, it will be administrated and scheduled per their needs.

Where mutual agreement has not been achieved, the parties can either:  1) refer to our frequently updated list of hearing officer recommendations and negotiate the choice on their own; or 2) contact the Litigation Alternatives case manager so that he or she can act as an honest broker of choices between the parties.  Contacting our office can be an effective way of choosing a neutral in the sense that this process tends to avoid the rejection of a mediator or arbitrator simply because it was suggested by the other party.

The candidates listed below are among those frequently found to be "mutually agreeable" to many parties while others have been added after positive experience with Litigation Alternatives, Inc.

Suggestions for additional candidates are welcomed and encouraged.

PERSONAL INJURY